Best practices for safe use of insulin pen devices in hospitals: Recommendations from an expert panel Delphi consensus process.

نویسندگان

  • Stuart T Haines
  • Margaret A Miklich
  • Charmaine Rochester-Eyeguokan
چکیده

PURPOSE A Delphi consensus development process was used to identify best practices for the safe use of insulin pen devices in hospitals. METHODS A panel of healthcare professionals with experience in patient safety activities and development of insulin-use guidelines was selected. In round 1 of a 4-round Delphi process, panelists were asked to identify key concepts and practices relating to safe use of insulin pen devices in hospitals. In round 2, panelists indicated their level of agreement with draft practice statements reflecting input received in round 1; statements with strong support were refined based on panelist suggestions. In round 3, the modified draft statements were rated for potential impact on patient safety. In round 4, panelists selected a final list of statements to recommend as best practices. RESULTS A 12-member interprofessional panel consisting of nurses, pharmacists, and physicians participated in the Delphi process. In round 1, panelists submitted more than 450 statements describing safe practices for insulin pen use. Based on that input, 125 draft practice statements were developed; among 98 statements receiving panelist support in round 2, 76 were judged in round 3 to be critical to patient safety or likely to have a positive impact on patient safety. In round 4, panelists unanimously affirmed a final list of 35 best-practice statements for the safe use of insulin pens in hospitals. CONCLUSION A Delphi consensus development process yielded a list of recommended best practices to help ensure the safe use of insulin pen devices in hospitals and health systems.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Enhancing insulin-use safety in hospitals: Practical recommendations from an ASHP Foundation expert consensus panel.

PURPOSE Consensus recommendations to help ensure safe insulin use in hospitalized patients are presented. SUMMARY Insulin products are frequently involved in medication errors in hospitals, and insulin is classified as a high-alert medication when used in inpatient settings. In an initiative to promote safer insulin use, the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP) Research and Ed...

متن کامل

Participation in a mentored quality-improvement program for insulin pen safety: Opportunity to augment internal evaluation and share with peers.

PURPOSE UF Health's participation in a mentored quality-improvement impact program for health professionals as part of an ASHP initiative-"Strategies for Ensuring the Safe Use of Insulin Pens in the Hospital"-is described. SUMMARY ASHP invited hospitals to participate in its initiative at a time when UF Health was evaluating the risks and benefits of insulin pen use due to external reports of...

متن کامل

Multidisciplinary consensus of best practice for pro re nata (PRN) psychotropic medications within acute mental health settings: a Delphi study.

There is a limited evidence base for the use of pro re nata (PRN) 'as required' psychotropic medication within acute mental health settings. This study aimed to explore expert opinion concerning issues and best practice for the prescribing and administration of psychotropic PRN medications within acute inpatient mental health settings. Eighteen experts participated in three Delphi rounds of a m...

متن کامل

How expert are the experts? An exploration of the concept of 'expert' within Delphi panel techniques.

The use of the term 'expert' occurs widely in healthcare research, in the context of national guidelines and consensus methods for the development of clinical protocols. Within consensus methods of research, especially Delphi panel techniques, the use of 'experts' is fundamental to reliability. Yet literature fails to debate the practicalities of defining 'experts' for use within Delphi panel r...

متن کامل

AHNS CONSENSUS STATEMENT Management of invasive well-differentiated thyroid cancer: An American Head and Neck Society Consensus Statement AHNS Consensus Statement

Background. Invasive differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) is relatively frequent, yet there is a paucity of specific guidelines devoted to its management. The Endocrine Committee of the American Head and Neck Society (AHNS) convened a panel to provide clinical consensus statements based on review of the literature, synthesized with the expert opinion of the group. Methods. An expert panel, selec...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists

دوره 73 19 Suppl 5  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2016